VVM The Visakanv Megaweb The Visakanv Megaweb

Welcome to theVisakanv Megaweb

Since 2008, Visa has been thinking out loud on the internet, sharing his ideas with the world. The result: a quarter-million tweets, more than a thousand essays and blog posts, and hundreds of videos. The Visakanv Megaweb collects all of it, plus the books and media Visa keeps recommending, into one archive, organized so you can find your way through. Pick a place to start.

262K
tweets
1,251
essays & blogs
459
videos

An archive of Twitter postsby Visakan Veerasamy

Visakan Veerasamy (@visakanv) has been posting on X (formerly Twitter) since 2008, racking up more than a quarter-million posts across dozens of topics. The Visakanv Megaweb organizes them into a single archive you can browse without friction. Explore Visa’s most popular posts, favorite themes, and online network via curated lists. Looking for something specific, or want to browse the archive your way? It’s all here: filters for date, length, and more, plus search across text and handles.

262K
tweets
26K+
threads
36
themes

0068: beyond Singapore

One Million Words · Sociocultural Commentary · 2013 · 1.6k words

Singapore is a tiny echo chamber, less than 0.1% of humanity. Maybe we should spend our energy on bigger problems, education, space, eradicating disease, instead of local drama.

0068 – beyond Singapore

For the most part my blog is known as a “Singaporean blog”. 6 or 7 (or more) of my top-grossing blogposts are all about local issues. CISCO, PM Lee, 2011 Election issues, that sort of thing. But lately I’ve grown a little disinterested in writing about these things. Just because it’s what I’m best recognized for doesn’t mean that it’s the best thing I could be doing with my time and energy.

I find myself revisiting a few thoughts over and over. Let’s suppose Singapore has 7 million people (which it doesn’t, but it makes for nicer back-of-envelope calculations). That makes us less than 0.1% of the 7 billion human beings we have on planet Earth. Less than 0.1%! That’s less than 1 in 1,000 people. It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that what we see is all there is.

But there’s more. There’s 99.9% of humanity out there. Singapore’s a tiny little echo chamber, an anomaly. It’s an interesting social and political anomaly for political scientists to study, but it’s really hard to pretend that our nation-state is significant in the grand scheme of things. I think the government understands this better than the citizenry- it’s easy for us to complain about things, and there are certainly lots of things to complain about, but we’re also a drop in a bigger bucket than most of us adequately conceive. (When I was volunteering with Singapore Prisons, the guy in charge used to use the term “piss in the ocean”. That’s what Singapore is.)

I don’t mean to say that small = necessarily insignificant. There are more people in Singapore than there are employees in Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple together- and those organizations I think arguably have more influence on the world than our country does. I don’t have any evidence for that, it just seems likely. The world would probably rather lose Singapore than Google. That’s the reality of the world we live in. And it raises some interesting things to explore and think about.

There are a lot of interesting and significant things going on in the world. Elon Musk is working on three of them- electric cars with Tesla, sustainable electricity production with Solar City, and manned space travel with SpaceX. Advancements in any of those things is incredibly exciting. The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation is working on eradicating polio, then malaria. These are incredibly significant things. Polio has been reduced over 99%, saving more than 10 million children from paralysis. That’s like, twice the size of Singapore, paralyzed. It’s practically impossible to visualize. Our species is on the verge of eradicating the disease altogether. Strikes me as a worthy problem to work on.

Technological advancements do incredible things. Things like Twitter and Facebook, even if they’re used by most people for superficial reasons, can be life-saving and enriching to others. Google has emergency response maps and data that’s going to save lives.

I would never get employed by Google, and I don’t think I’ll be able to contribute in any meaningful way, but it’s interesting to think about how there are certain spaces and places where a person can do a lot more for the species. There’s a Singaporean working in Google called Meng, and he’s Google’s “Jolly Good Fellow”, in charge of employee wellness or something like that. I wonder what his life is like.

You could be a teacher in a Singapore school and struggle miserably against the system, fighting to make a meaningful difference for the students in your classroom- their smiles and growth being your salve. Or you could seek to revolutionize and disrupt education altogether, like that science teacher from TED making accessible science videos, and the people at Khan Academy. You could build the future and impact millions. If you’re hell-bent on making a difference to individuals in a classroom, I guess this discussion isn’t for you- but if you just want to help people, I think it’s important to think about where you can make the biggest difference. It could be outright immoral to decline to think about it. It would be vaguely equivalent to letting people die.

Then and again, we’re all guilty of letting people die everyday. And I don’t want to guilt-trip anybody. All I’m saying is- maybe a little bit of effort and thought might direct us to put our energy into things that could potentially make a much bigger difference. Einstein said something along the lines of how his equations were more important to him than his politics, because politics were about the present, while his equations were for eternity. I think there’s something to that.

Lee Kuan Yew himself said that he never planned to get into politics. He only did out of necessity, because of the circumstances he was in. He was planning to make a comfortable living as a lawyer. Who knows what he’d have done if the Japanese never invaded? What would a young Lee Kuan Yew do if he were a young Singaporean today? Let’s assume he got his straight A’s in JC and completed his National Service as a great officer. Would he still want to get into Law? I believe he said something about being pragmatic and picking whatever’s lucrative… something about going into engineering instead. Maybe somebody can dig up that quote. Regardless, the point I’m loosely trying to make is- maybe Singapore matters less than we think it does.

That’s a rather heretical, treasony thing to say, so I’d need to qualify that. I’m incredibly thankful for being born in Singapore. We’re so blessed. We have the opportunity to bitch and whine and complain. Billions don’t. We have clean water, we have roofs over our heads, we have jobs, we have medicine. Singapore didn’t always have these things, and if it didn’t, I wouldn’t be able to write this. But LKY was a pragmatic man, and he should understand very well that people naturally get complacent when things get successful. He acknowledges that not all of the best and brightest are going to want to work in the civil service or in policy-making. Some of his own family and descendants are turned off by the idea. It’s a huge burden/sacrifice and the juice isn’t quite worth the squeeze in times like these. I’m not talking about money nearly as much as I’m talking about job satisfaction (and this is already coloured with a very privileged perspective). LKY and the founding fathers had their backs against the wall, they were caught between the devil and the deep blue sea. They had no choice but to take some crazy risks, many of which paid off. Now we are somewhat victims of our own success.

I’m reminded of the Punggol East by-election, and I’m thinking of the PAP candidate who was fielded there. Poor guy had no way to win. If he had won, the public would say “See lah, PAP candidate, parachute in there, backed by such power, confirm win. Untested guy. Loser.” If he had lost, as he did, people would find something negative to say too. THIS IS STRUCTURAL. It’s not the PAP’s fault. Anybody in power that long will be treated with this sort of suspicion and derision unless there are external crises to be dealt with.

So whose side am I on? I really don’t care anymore. I used to identify as “Pro-Singapore”, but now I’m not sure what even THAT means. There are some good people working on things. I met PM Lee and thought he was really thoughtful, perceptive, intelligent. Tharman Shanmugaratnam seems to really know his shit. I’ve heard really nice things about K Shanmugam and others. I really like Sylvia Lim and Chen Shao Mao and Vincent Wijeysingha. I wish everybody could just get along. I think it’s pretty clear that all of those people want what’s best for Singapore, but it’s easy to get caught up trying to win fights. The media doesn’t help, we don’t help- we always end up focusing on all the unnecessary, sensational personal drama (like the hawker ceiling nonsense- does it really MATTER?) rather than focusing on the more ‘boring’ problems that matter.

I think the problem is that there’s nothing very exciting for Singaporeans to work towards. If there is, we don’t know very much about it. We’re cramped and worried and confused. We turn on foreigners and we turn on each other. And we queue for Hello Kitty still, and minions… I won’t even try to explain that. The most exciting thing I’ve encountered in Singapore so far is Tong Yee’s School Of Thought. I’m a huge advocate for that. If I weren’t working in ReferralCandy, I’d beg Mr. Tong to take me in to do anything. (Assuming I can’t somehow run away to work for Elon Musk or Bill & Melinda Gates, or Jacqueline Novogratz’s Acumen Fund, or Kiva, or Khan Academy, or…)

Those people are working on exciting problems- they’re helping to revolutionize education. Here’s my vague vision of how this is going to happen- increasingly, kids are going to be differentiated based on what they do outside of school. Who builds the most interesting things, who works on the most interesting projects, who writes the most compelling essays, who makes the best videos.

The people who do these will be the ones who’re the most driven and passionate, and surrounded by the best peers. I think SOT has an early-mover advantage here. Mr. Tong and his kids are onto something special- a real entry point into what will be real bottom-up social change. That’s something to be excited about.

This is getting a bit long. Will continue in a part 2.

Originally published at https://visakanv.com/1000/0068-beyond-singapore/.

An archive of books and mediareferenced by Visakan Veerasamy

Visa is a prolific consumer of art and media. Over the years, he has referenced, reviewed, and recommended thousands of books, essays, articles, comics, and videos. The Visakanv Megaweb pulls his collection together in one place. Each item carries a link tracing it back to the mention.

About the Megaweb

The Visakanv Megaweb is a public archive of everything Visakan Veerasamy (@visakanv) has put on the internet: a quarter-million tweets, more than a thousand essays and blog posts, hundreds of videos, and the books and media he points to.

Visa has been thinking out loud online since 2008. The result is one of the largest bodies of personal writing on the web, but until now it has lived in scattered places: threads you unroll by hand, blogs on separate platforms, videos spread across years. The Megaweb pulls all of it into one place you can read and search.

What’s inside

The archive is in four parts. The Twitter Archive holds his posts, threads, replies, and quote-tweets. The Writing Archive collects his essays and blogs across three collections. The Video Archive gathers his vlogs, talks, and readings. The Library is everything he points to: the books, essays, articles, and videos he references in his own work.

How it’s organized

Each part is built to be browsed on its own terms. Read a theme from top to bottom, sort by what is most-loved or most-recent, narrow to replies or originals, or search the text directly. Every item keeps a link back to where it came from.

A note on the data

Counts, excerpts, and rankings are drawn from Visa’s public posts. Sourcing and update cadence are still being finalized.

Writer and internet builder, known online as @visakanv. Here are his books, where to support his work, and where to find him.

His books

FAN Friendly Ambitious NerdOn becoming a kinder, bolder, more curious version of yourself.Gumroad →Goodreads →
INT IntrospectAn inward hero’s journey to earn your own trust and self-respect; a remix of Nietzsche, Emerson, Watts, Campbell, and Jung.Gumroad →Goodreads →
An archive of Visakan Veerasamy’s online work.
Set in Fraunces, Geist, and Geist Mono.
Built by Mars Code Factory.
The Twitter ArchiveBest Tweets

Best Tweets

Many tweets from Visa are popular, but some are more popular than others. Browse the 1,000 most-liked top-level posts in Visa’s Twitter archive.

The Twitter ArchiveBest Threads

Best Threads

Visa is known for megathreading, and has written more than 26,000 threads since 2008. Explore his threads, including the longest and most popular. To page through every one, browse the full list →

The Twitter ArchiveLongest Threads

Longest Threads

Visa's biggest megathreads: his longest unbroken sequences, up to 200+ posts. See the best-loved →

204
tweets in the longest thread
7.3
years, longest-running thread
84
tweets, avg. length

The Twitter ArchiveAll Threads

All Threads

Every thread Visa has written: more than 26,000 since 2008. Search the text, narrow by year or length, and sort however you like. See the 1,000 best-loved →

26,381
threads
2021
peak year
102,048
tweets in threads
Search
Length
Year
Theme
26,422 threads

The Twitter ArchiveAll Tweets

All Tweets

Here is every reply, quote-tweet, thread, and standalone post from Visa’s Twitter archive, more than a quarter-million in all. Retweets aren’t included here. Browse all his retweets →

Search
Type
Theme
Year
251,277 tweets

Themes

Visa’s tweets have common threads and narrative arcs if you look closely. Explore the themes he’s focused on across his years on Twitter, and the tweets in each.

Search
36 themes
The Twitter ArchiveRecurring Posts

Recurring Posts

Visa is known for quoting and resharing his own tweets, often to resurface an insight or reinforce an idea. See every time he’s quoted himself or brought an old post back into a conversation.

34,006
self-quotes
13,033
distinct ideas
339
most resurfaced
Search
Year
Theme
4,874 recurring ideas

Retweets

The accounts and posts Visa amplifies. Not his words, but a record of who and what he has pointed his audience toward over the years. Self-retweets aside, here is everyone he has reshared.

Network

If Twitter is a public town square, Visa is the hyperactive, affable guy who talks to everyone: nearly half his posts (45%) are replies to other people. Below are the 100 accounts he replies to most.

Less a body of work than
a body of conversation

The shape of it

Every post and retweet, sorted not by what it’s about but by what it is.

How the mix shifted

His blend of replies, quotes, posts and retweets as a share of each year. Hover for any year.

Volume over time

Themes

What he posts about most. Toggle to see what actually lands.

His network

The accounts he engages with most. Toggle replies, quote-tweets, or retweets; tap a bar to open the account.

…and the same as a bubble field: the top accounts he replies to and quotes most, sized by how often. Hover or tap a bubble.

Hall of fame

All-time records across the archive.

The record-setting tweets

All of Observations & Humor

Every tweet in Observations & Humor. Search the text or a handle, narrow by date or to replies vs. originals, and sort however you like.

Search
Type
Year
16,834 tweets
reply312 likes2026-05-22
original2.1K likes2026-05-20
reply84 likes2026-05-19

placeholder copy and data · this same page serves any scope (a theme, an account)

Search
Year
Datesto

Your bookmarks