VVM The Visakanv Megaweb The Visakanv Megaweb

Welcome to theVisakanv Megaweb

Since 2008, Visa has been thinking out loud on the internet, sharing his ideas with the world. The result: a quarter-million tweets, more than a thousand essays and blog posts, and hundreds of videos. The Visakanv Megaweb collects all of it, plus the books and media Visa keeps recommending, into one archive, organized so you can find your way through. Pick a place to start.

262K
tweets
1,251
essays & blogs
459
videos

An archive of Twitter postsby Visakan Veerasamy

Visakan Veerasamy (@visakanv) has been posting on X (formerly Twitter) since 2008, racking up more than a quarter-million posts across dozens of topics. The Visakanv Megaweb organizes them into a single archive you can browse without friction. Explore Visa’s most popular posts, favorite themes, and online network via curated lists. Looking for something specific, or want to browse the archive your way? It’s all here: filters for date, length, and more, plus search across text and handles.

262K
tweets
26K+
threads
36
themes

0547: “if everyone were zombies”

One Million Words · Psychology & Emotions · 2016 · 1k words

A thought experiment: if you were the only conscious person in a world of automatons, you'd still face consequences and feel lonely. The real takeaway is to be mindful, stop caring about sheep opinions, and pursue what's interesting.

0547 – “if everyone were zombies”

It’s interesting to me that so many teenagers develop the idea that nobody understands them, that they’re uniquely self-aware and that (almost) every other person is merely a robotic automaton. It’s amusingly depicted in xkcd 610: Sheeple. “Look at all these people. Glassy-eyed automatons going about their daily lives, never stopping to look around and think! I’m the only conscious human in a world of sheep.”
 
The inverse idea is presented in some schools of zen or spirituality– that everybody around you is an incredibly enlightened teacher, put on this earth to teach you things that you might not even realise you’re here to be taught. Also an interesting idea. But right now I’m more fascinated by the first one. What if it were somehow true? What if you really WERE the only conscious human in the world? What would the implications be?
 
The first thought you might have is that you can do absolutely anything you wanted without worrying about what other people thought or cared. You can hurt and abuse people if you feel so inclined– they’re not really people, after all. But this doesn’t nearly work out as well as it might seem. Because while people might be glassy-eyed automatons, they’d still get hurt and upset, and they’d still respond negatively to your abuse. If you commit a crime in a world of sheep, the sheep are still going to punish you for it. So you still have to be mindful of the thoughts and feelings of the sheep.
 
There’s some nuance there, though. There’s no reason to worry about the sheep laughing at you or mocking you and so on, because you shouldn’t have to be concerned about the opinions of sheep– except when the sheep might choose to cause you harm.
 
Here’s where it gets a little messy. As a conscious human being, you’re wired to feel emotion, sympathy, shame, guilt– even if you’re surrounded by lesser minds. You’d still enjoy the affection of a puppy, you’d still feel pained witnessing the lonely cries of an abandoned kitten. Those emotions are instinctive, developed over hundreds of thousands of years as social creatures. We were social creatures before we were solitary individuals, and our minds (and bodies?) are designed for it. Herd mentalities are powerful phenomenon. Fear of social ostracisation is a powerful fear. Desire for prestige and social standing is a powerful impulse. These processes continue to function even if we learn that we’re in a world of sheep. Perhaps they might be lessened over time– perhaps we’d learn to recognise the impulses as impulses, and have the space to think about how we actually want to respond.
 
That seems like a good idea even if we lived in a world of thoughtful, enlightened, conscious beings.
 
What else would change? Suppose okay, you no longer worry about the opinions of others except when they might be used to cause you harm. You remain a generally friendly person, treating people as you would treat beloved stray animals– you give them space, you speak kindly to them, you’re warm and friendly. But you keep your distance from any that are violent, threatening pro otherwise unpleasant. You find a happy balance. What’s next?
 
Well, the next thing you might realise is that you can’t count on anybody else’s thinking, because a sheep’s thinking is generally ill-fitted for a conscious being. You might ask for people’s perspective in order to collect data, but you wouldn’t hold anybody else’s opinion as intrinsically more valuable than your own. You might trust an expert (say, an electrician-sheep) because of his expertise in a domain that you’re not familiar with, but you wouldn’t take him seriously when asking him about how to live your life. What you should prioritise, what you should focus on. Unless, perhaps, you ran into a sheep who was living a life that you admired. Suppose you encountered a successful entrepreneur-sheep, or a patriarch-sheep, and you recognized them as living lives that you’d want to emulate. As having circumstances that you’d like for yourself. Then yes, you’d solicit their advice. But again, you wouldn’t hold the advice itself as intrinsically sacred– you’d think “this is what the entrepreneur-sheep said”, and analyse it critically to see if there’s anything that he left out, anything that he misinterpreted and so on.
 
You especially wouldn’t worry about arguing with sheep in the abstract. You wouldn’t get your hands dirty in sheep forums, unless you were trying to achieve a particular result– trying to elicit a particular response, for example. But you wouldn’t lose sleep over the opinions of sheep. You would see it as all a game, and not be to attached to it.
 
You would be lonely. Or would you be? Would you ever be fully able to engage with any other being? What is the need or desire to engage with other beings, anyway? Some people have pet dogs and claim that it got rid of their depression. That seems to work. The actual complexity of the mind you’re interacting with is apparently not nearly as important as the seeming sincerity of the affection on display.
 
What am I even talking about. Why did I pursue this train of thought to begin with? I wanted to figure out if a sincerely solipsistic worldview would change my behaviour or life in any way. Would it make me miserable? I find that the answer is… I really don’t know. It seems improbable that glassy-eyed automatons might be more interesting than me, but it’s clear that there do exist people who are more interesting than me. So rather than pursue “maximum consciousness”, which we have no idea how to measure or verify, we could maybe pursue “maximum interestingness”.  That seems vaguely correct.
 
What if we went back to the zen question instead? What if everyone were enlightened teachers? How would that change interactions? I suppose it would prompt more engagement, more awareness, more attention from the part of the student.
 
I suppose that’s probably generally a good thing. So maybe the directive here is simply to be mindful.
 

Originally published at https://visakanv.com/1000/0547-everyone-zombies/.

An archive of books and mediareferenced by Visakan Veerasamy

Visa is a prolific consumer of art and media. Over the years, he has referenced, reviewed, and recommended thousands of books, essays, articles, comics, and videos. The Visakanv Megaweb pulls his collection together in one place. Each item carries a link tracing it back to the mention.

About the Megaweb

The Visakanv Megaweb is a public archive of everything Visakan Veerasamy (@visakanv) has put on the internet: a quarter-million tweets, more than a thousand essays and blog posts, hundreds of videos, and the books and media he points to.

Visa has been thinking out loud online since 2008. The result is one of the largest bodies of personal writing on the web, but until now it has lived in scattered places: threads you unroll by hand, blogs on separate platforms, videos spread across years. The Megaweb pulls all of it into one place you can read and search.

What’s inside

The archive is in four parts. The Twitter Archive holds his posts, threads, replies, and quote-tweets. The Writing Archive collects his essays and blogs across three collections. The Video Archive gathers his vlogs, talks, and readings. The Library is everything he points to: the books, essays, articles, and videos he references in his own work.

How it’s organized

Each part is built to be browsed on its own terms. Read a theme from top to bottom, sort by what is most-loved or most-recent, narrow to replies or originals, or search the text directly. Every item keeps a link back to where it came from.

A note on the data

Counts, excerpts, and rankings are drawn from Visa’s public posts. Sourcing and update cadence are still being finalized.

Writer and internet builder, known online as @visakanv. Here are his books, where to support his work, and where to find him.

His books

FAN Friendly Ambitious NerdOn becoming a kinder, bolder, more curious version of yourself.Gumroad →Goodreads →
INT IntrospectAn inward hero’s journey to earn your own trust and self-respect; a remix of Nietzsche, Emerson, Watts, Campbell, and Jung.Gumroad →Goodreads →
An archive of Visakan Veerasamy’s online work.
Set in Fraunces, Geist, and Geist Mono.
Built by Mars Code Factory.
The Twitter ArchiveBest Tweets

Best Tweets

Many tweets from Visa are popular, but some are more popular than others. Browse the 1,000 most-liked top-level posts in Visa’s Twitter archive.

The Twitter ArchiveBest Threads

Best Threads

Visa is known for megathreading, and has written more than 26,000 threads since 2008. Explore his threads, including the longest and most popular. To page through every one, browse the full list →

The Twitter ArchiveLongest Threads

Longest Threads

Visa's biggest megathreads: his longest unbroken sequences, up to 200+ posts. See the best-loved →

204
tweets in the longest thread
7.3
years, longest-running thread
84
tweets, avg. length

The Twitter ArchiveAll Threads

All Threads

Every thread Visa has written: more than 26,000 since 2008. Search the text, narrow by year or length, and sort however you like. See the 1,000 best-loved →

26,381
threads
2021
peak year
102,048
tweets in threads
Search
Length
Year
Theme
26,422 threads

The Twitter ArchiveAll Tweets

All Tweets

Here is every reply, quote-tweet, thread, and standalone post from Visa’s Twitter archive, more than a quarter-million in all. Retweets aren’t included here. Browse all his retweets →

Search
Type
Theme
Year
251,277 tweets

Themes

Visa’s tweets have common threads and narrative arcs if you look closely. Explore the themes he’s focused on across his years on Twitter, and the tweets in each.

Search
36 themes
The Twitter ArchiveRecurring Posts

Recurring Posts

Visa is known for quoting and resharing his own tweets, often to resurface an insight or reinforce an idea. See every time he’s quoted himself or brought an old post back into a conversation.

34,006
self-quotes
13,033
distinct ideas
339
most resurfaced
Search
Year
Theme
4,874 recurring ideas

Retweets

The accounts and posts Visa amplifies. Not his words, but a record of who and what he has pointed his audience toward over the years. Self-retweets aside, here is everyone he has reshared.

Network

If Twitter is a public town square, Visa is the hyperactive, affable guy who talks to everyone: nearly half his posts (45%) are replies to other people. Below are the 100 accounts he replies to most.

Less a body of work than
a body of conversation

The shape of it

Every post and retweet, sorted not by what it’s about but by what it is.

How the mix shifted

His blend of replies, quotes, posts and retweets as a share of each year. Hover for any year.

Volume over time

Themes

What he posts about most. Toggle to see what actually lands.

His network

The accounts he engages with most. Toggle replies, quote-tweets, or retweets; tap a bar to open the account.

…and the same as a bubble field: the top accounts he replies to and quotes most, sized by how often. Hover or tap a bubble.

Hall of fame

All-time records across the archive.

The record-setting tweets

All of Observations & Humor

Every tweet in Observations & Humor. Search the text or a handle, narrow by date or to replies vs. originals, and sort however you like.

Search
Type
Year
16,834 tweets
reply312 likes2026-05-22
original2.1K likes2026-05-20
reply84 likes2026-05-19

placeholder copy and data · this same page serves any scope (a theme, an account)

Search
Year
Datesto

Your bookmarks